Pro Gains does not have a credible current net worth figure to report, and that is not a gap in the research. It is the answer. The company, formally registered as PRO GAINS LIMITED (Companies House number 09407495), entered liquidation in 2017, roughly a year after its Dragons' Den appearance. Wikipedia's list of Dragons' Den offers for Series 11-20 also records Pro Gains (Professional Gains), pitched by Marco Hajikypri, as a failed pitch blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">entered liquidation in 2017. The on-show implied valuation was £2.5 million, based on Marco Hajikypri's pitch of £125,000 for 5% equity in Series 14, Episode 2, aired 31 July 2016. No deal was made. The business later wound up. Any figure you see on other sites labelled as a "Pro Gains Dragons' Den net worth" is either an echo of that pitch-night implied valuation, a domain-tool estimate with no connection to equity, or outright confusion with a similarly named brand.
Pro Gains Dragons’ Den Net Worth: Valuation and Evidence
What exactly is Pro Gains in the Dragons' Den context?
Pro Gains, or Professional Gains as it was sometimes styled, was a fitness supplement and nutrition business pitched by entrepreneur Marco Hajikypri on Dragons' Den Series 14, Episode 2. The business model centred on meal-prep and sports nutrition products. During the episode, Marco claimed the company had turned over roughly a quarter of a million pounds in revenue and described a growing operation with what he later told press outlets had expanded to three units and 33 employees after the show aired. The company was incorporated on 27 January 2015 according to Companies House filing records.
The confusion around the name is worth flagging early. "Pro Gains" overlaps with multiple fitness-related brands, YouTube channels, and supplement lines that have nothing to do with Dragons' Den. If you searched this term and landed on a result describing a content creator, a US-based supplement company, or a generic fitness product line, that is a different entity entirely. The Dragons' Den connection belongs specifically to Marco Hajikypri's PRO GAINS LIMITED, company number 09407495.
The best-supported valuation range right now

There is no meaningful post-pitch net worth range to give for Pro Gains, because the company no longer exists as a trading entity. It entered winding-up proceedings, confirmed in The Gazette's official public notices for PRO GAINS LIMITED (09407495). That is a primary-source record, not speculation. The only defensible valuation figure tied to this business is the implied pre-money valuation of £2.5 million from the Dragons' Den pitch itself, and even that was contested on the night by the Dragons, particularly Peter Jones, who challenged the basis for that number.
After the show, Marco Hajikypri made headlines by claiming he had been offered around £90 million for the business, with some press coverage going further and citing a potential valuation reaching £1 billion. IBTimes UK coverage reiterates Marco Hajikypri’s later “offered £90 million” claim after his Dragons’ Den appearance, while framing it as an on-going assertion rather than a documented transaction. These claims were reported by outlets including the Express and Star, IBTimes UK, and AOL. To be clear: there is no documented evidence of a completed £90 million transaction, no public filing, no verified acquisition record, and no independent financial report supporting these figures. They appear to derive entirely from Marco's own public statements and should be treated as unverified claims, not established valuations.
| Valuation Claim | Source | Status | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| £2.5 million (implied on-show) | Dragons' Den pitch, Series 14 Ep 2, Jul 2016 | Confirmed pitch figure | Reliable as a pitch-night number, not independently verified |
| ~£2 million (press rounding) | AOL / UK press reprints | Reported figure | Consistent with pitch maths, no new evidence |
| £90 million (offer claimed) | Marco Hajikypri public statements | Unverified claim | No transaction records or independent confirmation |
| £1 billion (potential) | Press headlines citing Marco's statements | Speculative/PR claim | No supporting financial data |
| Domain value estimate (progains.co.uk) | Hypestat and similar tools | Domain metric only | Not equity valuation, irrelevant to company net worth |
How net worth estimates get calculated for deals like this
For brands that appear on Dragons' Den, net worth or valuation estimates typically flow from one of four sources: the implied valuation stated in the pitch (equity percentage divided into the cash requested), post-show funding rounds with disclosed terms, Companies House filings showing assets and liabilities, or press coverage of acquisitions and revenue milestones. In Pro Gains' case, only the first of those four produced any publicly usable number, and even that was challenged on air.
Reference sites that publish "net worth" figures for Dragons' Den companies often use the pitch valuation as a baseline, then layer on post-show press coverage of revenue claims or deal announcements. The problem is that without audited accounts, verified deal documents, or Companies House accounts showing actual profit and asset positions, any figure beyond the pitch valuation is speculative. For a company that subsequently went into liquidation, even the pitch-night implied valuation is largely academic.
This is a very different situation from, say, a Dragons' Den pitch where a deal was actually completed and the investor's stake can be tracked, or where the company later filed public accounts showing strong revenue growth. Pro Gains had neither outcome.
The full timeline: pitch to liquidation

- 27 January 2015: PRO GAINS LIMITED incorporated (Companies House number 09407495).
- 31 July 2016: Marco Hajikypri pitches on Dragons' Den Series 14, Episode 2, requesting £125,000 for 5% equity, implying a £2.5 million pre-money valuation. Revenue at time of pitch stated on-show as approximately £250,000. No deal is offered by the Dragons.
- Post-broadcast (late 2016 into 2017): Marco claims to press that the business expanded to three locations and 33 employees after the TV exposure. He also claims to have received an offer of around £90 million, though no acquisition is publicly recorded.
- 2017: PRO GAINS LIMITED enters liquidation proceedings. A winding-up order is recorded in The Gazette, the official UK public record for insolvency events.
- Post-2017: No further trading activity is publicly documented. The Companies House page remains accessible as a historical record.
What the evidence actually confirms versus what is speculation
Let's draw a clear line here between what is verified and what is not, because these two categories get blended together constantly in online coverage of Dragons' Den companies.
| Claim | Evidence Type | Confirmed? |
|---|---|---|
| Company incorporated January 2015 | Companies House official filing | Yes |
| Pitched on Series 14 Ep 2, 31 July 2016 | BBC broadcast record, multiple media reports | Yes |
| Pitch was £125,000 for 5% equity | Multiple consistent press sources, Startups.co.uk episode recap | Yes |
| No deal was offered by the Dragons | Programme record, multiple media confirmations | Yes |
| Revenue of ~£250,000 stated on-show | Reported in-episode claim by Marco, per Startups.co.uk | Stated on-show, not independently audited |
| 33 employees and 3 units post-show | Marco's own press statements (Express and Star) | Unverified, self-reported |
| £90 million offer received | Marco's public statements, reported by IBTimes UK, AOL | Unverified, no transaction record |
| Company entered liquidation 2017 | The Gazette official public notice, Companies House records | Yes |
| Current trading or active business | No evidence found | Not confirmed |
Why you see wildly different numbers on other sites
There are a few recurring problems that cause net worth figures for Dragons' Den companies to look wildly inconsistent across websites, and Pro Gains is a textbook example of most of them.
- Pitch valuation treated as current company value: Sites pick up the £2.5 million implied pitch valuation and present it as though the company is worth that today. It was a negotiating position on a TV show in 2016, not a market-tested valuation.
- Self-reported claims amplified uncritically: The £90 million offer claim originated with Marco's own statements and was reprinted by multiple outlets with no independent verification. Aggregator sites then treat these reprints as corroboration.
- Domain tool confusion: Sites like Hypestat produce "net worth" estimates for web domains (progains.co.uk) based on traffic metrics. These are domain advertising value estimates, not equity valuations, but they get indexed under the same search terms.
- Name collision errors: Multiple fitness brands, channels, and products share similar names. A net worth figure sourced from a US supplement brand or a YouTube fitness channel called "Pro Gains" will end up attributed to the Dragons' Den company in aggregated results.
- Ignoring liquidation records: Sites that do not check Companies House or The Gazette will not know the company wound up in 2017, so they continue presenting valuations as if the business is still active.
This pattern is not unique to Pro Gains. Dragons' Den valuations in general are frequently misunderstood, as community discussions around the show repeatedly highlight. The implied equity valuation from a pitch is a starting point for negotiation, not a verified market value, and post-show performance varies enormously from company to company.
How to verify the numbers yourself today

If you want to do your own due diligence rather than rely on what you find in a search result, here is exactly where to look and what to look for.
- Companies House (find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk): Search for PRO GAINS LIMITED or company number 09407495. Check the filing history tab for confirmation of incorporation date, any filed accounts, and dissolution/liquidation notices. This is your most reliable primary source.
- The Gazette (thegazette.co.uk): Search for PRO GAINS LIMITED under insolvency notices. The winding-up order entry there is the definitive public record of the company's financial end. No interpretation needed, it is a legal notice.
- Trademark and IP records (GOV.UK intellectual property office): Search for Pro Gains or Professional Gains to see whether any active UK trademark exists. If the trademark lapsed or was never filed, that is a signal the brand had limited commercial continuity.
- Press archive search: Use Google News filtered by date, searching for "Marco Hajikypri" or "Professional Gains" alongside "Dragons Den". Read the original source articles, not aggregator summaries, and note whether financial claims are attributed to Marco directly or to independent verification.
- BBC iPlayer or programme guides: Series 14, Episode 2 details confirm the pitch date and format. Some episode summaries on BBC or third-party TV databases include outcome notes.
- Domain footprint check: Visit progains.co.uk or search for current social media profiles. A dormant site, expired social channels, or redirected domain all signal a company that is no longer actively trading.
The honest takeaway from running these checks is that Pro Gains Limited wound up, no deal was made on the show, the £90 million offer claim has no paper trail, and the current net worth is effectively zero as an operating entity. That is not a surprising conclusion for many Dragons' Den pitches that did not land a deal, and Pro Gains is far from alone in that outcome.
Putting it in context: Pro Gains versus other Dragons' Den stories
Pro Gains is one of many fitness and supplement brands that have come through Dragons' Den pitches over the years, and its story follows a pattern the show has seen repeatedly: a business with genuine early revenue, an ambitious valuation, a failed pitch, post-show media buzz driven by the entrepreneur's own claims, and then a quiet wind-down. It is worth comparing this to other Dragons' Den brand stories where the outcomes are more documentable, whether through completed deals, active Companies House accounts, or verifiable growth milestones. Some other Dragons' Den-related brands and businesses tracked on this site, including those connected to specific Dragons like Theo Paphitis or entrepreneurs such as Tej Lalvani, have much clearer post-show financial trails because deals were completed and investor stakes are on record. Theo Paphitis' involvement can lead to more trackable valuations, so his Dragons' Den deals typically have clearer net worth signals than Pro Gains.
For Pro Gains, the honest summary is this: the only number with any evidential basis is the £2. You can still come across conflicting claims for the gener8 Dragons' Den net worth, but they usually trace back to unverified anecdotes rather than audited figures. 5 million implied valuation from the pitch night, the company no longer exists, and every figure beyond that should be treated as unverified until someone produces a transaction record or audited account that supports it. If you are researching this for investment research, business case study purposes, or simple curiosity, the Companies House and Gazette records give you the clearest picture available.
FAQ
Why do so many websites list a “Pro Gains Dragons’ Den net worth” number if the company went into liquidation?
Most “net worth” listings are reconstructed from the pitch-night implied valuation (cash requested and equity percentage), then loosely updated using unverified press claims. Once a company is in winding-up, there is no ongoing trading value to anchor those sites, so later numbers are typically either pitch echoes or speculative estimates without audited accounts or a documented acquisition.
Is the £2.5 million from Dragons’ Den a real market valuation of Pro Gains?
It is best treated as a negotiation starting point (implied pre-money valuation) derived from the terms offered on air, not a confirmed market price. The Dragons challenged the basis for the figure during the episode, and the absence of a completed deal means there was no agreed valuation supported by investor paperwork.
How can I tell whether a “£90 million offer” claim has any paper trail?
Check for a published acquisition or investment agreement, Companies House filings that reflect the transfer of control or shareholder changes, and any liquidation-related documents that show proceeds from an asset sale. If none exist, the claim should be treated as a statement of intent or a personal claim rather than an executed transaction.
What should “net worth” mean for a company that is wound up or in liquidation?
In this context, it is not a continuously updated figure like a public-company market cap. Practically, it becomes a balance of assets versus liabilities subject to liquidation costs and creditor priority, and often results in little or no equity for former owners. That is why a “current net worth” label can be misleading for liquidated entities.
Can I use the revenue figures Marco mentioned after the show to compute valuation?
You should not rely on non-audited revenue statements alone. Without filed accounts, verified customer concentration data, margins, and cash conversion, any valuation math becomes guesswork. Even if revenue claims were accurate, net worth would still depend on liabilities, inventory, customer payables, and the company’s ability to keep profits after costs.
Are domain-tool estimates ever a reliable way to estimate a company’s net worth?
No. Domain valuation tools estimate website or brand-related resale value, not the financial value of an incorporated trading business. For Pro Gains, those estimates have no direct link to the equity that was negotiated on Dragons’ Den or to any audited assets and liabilities.
If I want to verify the “right” Pro Gains, how do I avoid confusing similarly named brands?
Anchor your research to the registered company details (PRO GAINS LIMITED, Companies House number 09407495) rather than the business name alone. Then cross-check that entity against Companies House and The Gazette notices to confirm liquidation and identity.
What are the most reliable sources to use for Dragons’ Den companies’ valuations?
Use pitch terms only for implied valuation, Companies House for incorporation status and liquidation records, and The Gazette for formal insolvency notices. Then treat press-only acquisition claims as unverified unless you can match them to documented deals, filings, or court and insolvency documents.
Does Pro Gains having no completed deal mean investors lost money, or could there still be value?
A failed pitch means no investor stake was documented from that episode, but it does not automatically prove investor losses, because any later funding or deals would require separate documentation. For Pro Gains specifically, the liquidation and lack of a verified acquisition record suggest limited recoverable equity for shareholders, but creditor-level outcomes still require insolvency documentation to confirm.
If I’m writing a case study, what is a defensible “valuation takeaway” for Pro Gains?
Use the pitch-night implied valuation as the only evidentially tied figure and clearly state that it was contested and not converted into a deal. Then note that post-show “net worth” figures are not supported by audited accounts or a transaction record, because the company was wound up.
Dragons’ Den Theo Paphitis Net Worth: Updated Estimate
Theo Paphitis net worth estimate for Dragons’ Den, explained with ranges, key wealth drivers, and how to verify updates.


